Flipping TED

 

Ok lots of people obviously already knew about this but I have just seen it – this is very very cool….. TED-Ed allows you to create an interactive online lesson based on a YouTube lesson.  You can add questions, text with links, and track learners interactions with the material. Very cool!

TED_Ed_screenshot

I also came across another online product – Lecture Tools (now part of Echo 360) – which allows you to build an online course based on a PowerPoint that you upload. You can also link YouTube video with your course, and track student progress.  You can build two courses with the Trial Licence, or purchase a licence.

 

 

 

 

Two months on ….

Hard to believe that it has been two months since the last time I posted.  I have definitely intended to post earlier…..

Since March I have completed at Gamification course with the University of Pennsylvania via coursera.org.   According to the site:

Coursera is an education company that partners with the top universities and organizations in the world to offer courses online for anyone to take, for free. Our technology enables our partners to teach millions of students rather than hundreds.

The Gamification course was surprising – I was expecting something fairly straightforward, interesting but not too challenging – it was free after all.  But the course involved completing multiple choice quizzes and short assignments – which required staying with the program and really thinking about applying the knowledge gained.

For me, however, the most valuable aspects of the program were in its processes rather than its content.

The content hinged on well designed videos, which I learned were created using Camtasia.  The videos integrated video recordings of Professor Kevin Werbach with PowerPoint slides and occasional multi-choice questions to check understanding.  As he spoke, Professor Werbach used drawing tools to highlight points on the slides.

Screenshot of a video lecture from Gamification Course

Screenshot of a video lecture from Gamification Course featuring Professor Kevin Werbach

These videos were very cleverly developed.  Werbach set a challenge in the first video to look for a hidden message, paying particular attention to changes in items on the bookshelves behind him.  Even when the puzzle was solved I couldn’t help but notice the items changing in each video I watched.

Other tools used in the course were discussion forums, which were very lively.  Over 62,000 people registered for the course, with almost 6,000 successfully achieving a pass mark.

The course offered an option of a “signature Track”. For $39 you could opt for a verification process, so that your certificate with results might hold more credibility as your identity was verified each time you completed a quiz or submitted an assignment.  The verification process involved typing the same sentence each time, and a web-cam snapshot.  As I completed all work around 1am, I was always rugged up and looking sleepy!

I enrolled in another course via Open2Study – an Australian site similar to Coursera.  However, I quickly realised that keeping up with both courses was a challenge, and so I let the second course lapse.

Again, this was a point of learning – that we can assume that because a course is free that it will require little effort – when in fact, this online learning environment truly is a place where what you get out of it really does rely on what you put in.

 

My Weekend of Learning

I had the chance (and the energy!) to catch up on my web reading and vid viewing on the weekend.  I got to watch some great podcasts by Mike Rohde, and that inspired me to try to capture my learning.

 

I caught up with quite a few Peter Senge videos to revisit the five disciplines, systems thinking in particular, and his move to advocating for greater awareness of the unseen consequences of our actions.  He particulary highlights environmental and social consequences, which are often not seen before they occur far away from the cause (children working in factories) or over time (reduction in available fossil fuels), or both (melting of glaciers).  I made some quick notes regarding the disciplines here:

Senge's Five Disciplines

 

These are some of my brief notes from my web weekend 🙂

Nancy White interviewing Etienne Wenger-Trayner:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NsnGKZXN80U

  • Learning becomes a social discipline
  • design as process of social learning
  • create a story out of everybody’s story
  • bigger than the sum of the parts
  • whose voices are being heard
  • where do we put boundaries
  • where do we cross boundaries

Peter Senge on Leadership

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=68unIDHgWhY

  • Leadership is about the capacity of a human community to shape its future
  • The creative orientation
  • How we accomplish things that really matter to us

Peter Senge: Breaking the Cycle of Fatalism

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6SRBiHH3BCI

If you do not shift people’s belief that they cannot affect their future nothing else you do will matter – every type of help you give them will just reinforce that the fact that they cannot help themselves – reinforce their sense that the power is there – outside of me

(Quoting Mwalimu Musheshe)

Systems Thinking with Peter Senge

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b1G0Fs__u4g

  • Systems thinking means it is not just about the decision but it is about the conversation that we had – did it build a sense of trust and understanding
  • For learning to take place I have to be prepared to be wrong

Navigating Webs of Interdependence

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HOPfVVMCwYg&feature=player_embedded#!

  • Forgoing short term for long term
  • Collective achievements
  • Collective intelligence

One of the best posts I have read in a long time is this one by Jane Hart, where she describes 10 reasons NOT to create a course – and 10 other options (with examples).  Jane’s reasons will make a lot of sense to people.  She then goes on to suggest alternatives – and provides examples for each suggestion.  Some of these examples are valuable in their own right.  Tiny Training was eye-opening for me for a couple of reasons.  Firstly I wondered how Jane could possibly design and maintain another site!  Secondly, this site finally convinced me that Twitter could be used in creative, meaningful ways to promote and embed learning.  The site lists a range of Tiny activities which could be quite valuable in complementing other learning activities.

Another site Jane’s article mentioned was Dave’s Ensampler – Types of Job Aids.  I believe strongly that many skills covered in training programs could be addressed – or at the very least reinforced by – well designed job aids.  This site provides exdamples of different types of job aids, and some design tips for designing your own.

So – in wrapping up this post – what I learned helped me feel energised and equipped again to look at my work in a different way, and to seek to provide a learning context where the learners can effectively manage their pathways.

Quote relating to learning – sharing of knowledge

Harold Jarche in his short book on Personal Knowledge Management:

As knowledge management expert Dave Snowden says, we are not very good at articulating our knowledge; “We always know more than we can say, and we will always say more than we can write down.”  

If we take on this perspective, what does that mean for how we support people to learn….

We must provide opportunities for observations, for questioning and reflecting….

We must also provide space and time for conversations….

Falling behind – catching up

I registered for a four week program that I have wanted to do for some time – “Personal Knowledge Management” with Harold Jarche, via the Social Learning Centre.  After registering though, I had some long days at work, the kids were back at school, and I was immediately ‘behind’ and felt more and more overwhelmed each day if I thought about getting into the program.

This is an important learning experience for me – I was/am motivated and yet…. I am letting the flow of emails into my Inbox, and the feeling of being lost, block me from getting into the program.  I know that the structure of the discussion forum does not particularly suit me.  It is not threaded in terms of topic, so I find it laborious to go through all posts and comments to work out what has been discussed.

Still … I should be able to get over that!  And I will – today – cos I have injured my knee and have a day off work.  So I am going to take advantage of the change in pace (see earlier post) and get myself sorted out!

‘Slow’ learning

I watched a recent Big Ideas program which featured a panel from a conference at the Royal Society of Art, discussing ‘The Slow Revolution’.  Listening to the speakers discuss this emerging social and personal philosophy led me to thinking about the pace of life – and the pace of learning.  Several themes emerged from the discussion.

Pace – or finding the right tempo – was significant.  The right tempo….. how often do we set the tempo based on what we must cram into our learners’ minds in a given period of time.  How much time does it take to embed a skill or knowledge.  Where is the right place to make the time….

The story of someone asking for directions in New York: “How do you get to Juilliard?”

The reported reply: Practice, practice, practice… How do we allow time for practice, how do we value practice…

How are we connected – to the food we eat, to the people who make the things we buy, to the businesses we invest in, to the longer term outcomes of our actions and our decisions.

Being mindful and discerning about the many aspects of our lives.

Our sense of mortality – our own and that of the Earth.

And so in learning – what might reflection on the ‘Slow Revolution’ offer us.

I am thinking that it encourages us to work with our learners to see connections between what they are doing, and the outcomes.  It also encourages us to pause, to listen, to consider what we provide.  It could also prompt us to consider spacing of formal learning events, to allow time for new learning to become embedded and for practice… practice… practice…

 

Our knowledge of technology, content and pedagogy – the interplay

TPACK Model - shows the interrelationships between knowledge of technology, content and pedagogy

TPACK Model – shows the interrelationships between knowledge of technology, content and pedagogy

I read a post tonight on the blog – Dreaming Weaving Learning – entitled “The Fallacy of Being a Facilitator“.  The post explored the TPACK model, which looks at the elements of knowledge that a teacher needs to consider when approaching the learning process – technology, content, and pedagogy.  Reading this prompted me to think about the model from the learner’s point of view – so how does their learning incorporate knowledge and skill in not just the content area, but also in the areas of technology and pedagogy (learning to learn).

 

Post drafted in October :-)

It has again been a long time since I have posted.  I have drafted many posts in my head but not put pen to paper, or fingers to keys.  Sometimes you just need to wait for the right time.

Since my last post I have graduated.  My mum, husband, and daughters all travelled with me to the graduation ceremony.  This was the first face-to-face contact I had had with the university – isn’t that amazing in itself!  The ceremony was so well organised (congratulations to University of Southern Queensland) and I felt like I drank in every second of it.  For me, it was like being a part of something big – really for the first time during these most recent studies.

When I studied at University of Queensland, I was surrounded by the buildings, many quite old, by thousands of people, and you knew you were a part of something.

Don’t get me wrong – I have felt a part of something during my online studies – just a part of something quite different.  There was a sense of scale due to the international student population in every class, but I think that the connection with the University itself was pretty loose.

 

Catching up….

It has been some time since my last post.  The learning has continued but the head space for posting has been exhausted!

My formal studies with University of Southern Queensland have finished, and I graduate in a couple of weeks!!!  While it is certainly a relief – the last semester was particularly difficult – I miss the anticipation of a new semester, wondering about what interesting people I will meet, and where the study might take me.  Studying for me was like a compulsory creative outlet, and a source of affirmation that there are like-minded people around.

The last few months have taught me that learning is not always something that is valued – certainly not formal learning, or enabled informal learning.  All the research in the world does not matter if decision makers don’t care about evidence.  Building a positive culture can quickly become a focus on sustaining survivors and victims alike in the face of unprecedented job cuts and vanishing budgets.